A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, leading to an encroachment on the Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
For the Main in the dispute is often a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically trying to make a family residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.