A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours about the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water throughout serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the positioning turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who should Are living together with each other lengthy after the authorized fees have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building works at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation lengthen past that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges for instance environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.