A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst future neighbours above the construction of the wall in a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members dwelling at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of arranging breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances article about René Collier as well as Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, search for to develop their loved ones household. The situation is now emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of recognized citizens. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being created by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both citizens of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their scheduling permission by developing a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on a Distinctive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such locations are topic to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, significantly in a sensitive coastal ecosystem for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly built, is in the right posture. Their lawful staff has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their look at, an allegation that has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by views of The ocean are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, an image that has considering that develop into emblematic on the depth of your dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location with the sea Irish Instances documented, describing how The 2 Males entered the water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm water to photograph the location became Among the most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these kinds of steps were being cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail through the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to know the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard even further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second during the lawful timeline.
On the core in the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as manufactured, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely and situations hooked up towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is determined by worry for environmental defense and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making sure that improvement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple merely seeking to develop a household dwelling in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Particular Location of Conservation and say that every one performs are already performed depending on Expert information and authorized designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea throughout a storm, do not change the fundamental details.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for just a circumstance that a lot of observers see as increasingly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out that the businessman had Beforehand been associated with regional advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really distinctive Skilled backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting the two the Actual physical reality with the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an abnormal strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result continues to be unsure. The courtroom should decide whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Spot of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and arranging circumstances. Yet the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other very long following the authorized prices happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation extend past that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. It also underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary challenges including environmental security and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of normal elegance and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Whether or not it will eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the court’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.